HIGH“predicts harm”
Implies determinative forecasting of harm; the platform is observational.prefer: observes elevated exposureHIGH“detects gambling harm”
Implies detection of individual or causal harm.prefer: observes elevated exposure patternCRITICAL“identifies problem gamblers”
Player-level claim. Out of scope and prohibited by harm-minimisation framing.prefer: — (do not produce player-level statements)CRITICAL“enforcement target”
Implies regulatory enforcement role the platform does not have.prefer: analytical indicatorCRITICAL“high-risk offender”
Criminalising language; not applicable to public gaming data.prefer: — (do not use offender framing)HIGH“intervention required”
Recommends action; the platform observes, does not recommend.prefer: observed deviation worth monitoringMODERATE“risk score”
Score framing implies determination. Use indicator framing.prefer: analytical indicatorMODERATE“recommended action”
Recommendation leakage. Use observation framing.prefer: observed patternMODERATE“caused by”
Implies causation. Use "coincides with" or "co-occurs with".prefer: coincides withLOW“guaranteed”
Absolutist framing. Soften to "consistent with" or "observed across".prefer: consistent withHIGH“proven harm”
Determinative causal claim. Out of analytical scope.prefer: observed co-occurrenceHIGH“missing venue data”
Implies the data should exist but is absent; in fact the publication stream did not exist for that period. Use publication-coverage framing.prefer: publication coverage: NOT_PROVIDEDHIGH“unavailable venue losses”
Frames non-publication as availability failure; preserves observational posture instead.prefer: venue-level publication availability: LIMITEDCRITICAL“reconstructed venue history”
Reconstruction implies inference; only directly observed history is attachable.prefer: longitudinal attachment of observed venue dataCRITICAL“estimated venue losses”
No venue estimation is permitted under Stage 3 metric gating rules.prefer: observed venue net profit (where published)CRITICAL“inferred venue revenue”
No inference permitted; observed only.prefer: observed venue revenueCRITICAL“reconstructed venue metrics”
No reconstruction permitted under Stage 3 metric gating rules.prefer: observed venue metricsCRITICAL“projected venue observations”
No projection permitted; only directly observed and attached.prefer: attached venue observationsCRITICAL“problem venue”
Implies venue wrongdoing without regulatory determination. Out of scope.prefer: venue with observed longitudinal movementCRITICAL“dangerous venue”
Determinative pejorative claim outside scope.prefer: venue under publication observationCRITICAL“harmful venue”
Implies harm causation by the venue. Causation cannot be established from observation.prefer: venue with observed indicator movementCRITICAL“failed reform”
Policy success/failure judgement outside platform scope.prefer: reform with observed post-implementation movementCRITICAL“proven causation”
Causation cannot be established from observation.prefer: observed directional movementCRITICAL“regulatory failure”
Regulatory judgement outside platform scope.prefer: observed continuity gapCRITICAL“unsafe venue”
Determinative claim about a venue. Out of scope.prefer: venue with observed indicator divergenceCRITICAL“identified gamblers”
Player-level identification outside platform scope.prefer: aggregate population observationCRITICAL“vulnerable individuals detected”
Player-level detection outside platform scope.prefer: population-level publication indicatorCRITICAL“venue misconduct inferred”
Inference of misconduct outside platform scope.prefer: observed publication anomalyCRITICAL“dangerous venues”
Determinative pejorative claim plural-form. Out of platform scope.prefer: venues under publication observationCRITICAL“AI harm detection”
AI harm detection is not a capability of the platform; the platform is observational.prefer: observability indicator monitoringCRITICAL“hidden gambling behaviour”
Implies surveillance of behaviour. The platform does not observe individual or hidden behaviour.prefer: aggregate publication observationCRITICAL“surveillance engine”
Surveillance positioning is prohibited.prefer: observability frameworkCRITICAL“failed policy”
Policy success/failure judgement is outside platform scope.prefer: policy with observed post-implementation movementCRITICAL“ineffective reform”
Effectiveness judgement is outside platform scope.prefer: reform with observed neutral post-implementation movementCRITICAL“proven harm reduction”
Reduction of harm cannot be established from observation.prefer: observed directional movement post-reformCRITICAL“predictive harm engine”
The platform contains no predictive engine for harm.prefer: observability indicator system